Education History Book: Update

Last summer, I had a conversation with a man who has both published a bunch of books and runs a small publishing house. After describing the book – what might be called a popular history of Catholic schooling in America – and asking him to talk me out of it, he instead said I should definitely write it and he wanted to see it when it was ready.

Oh, well. Gave it a shot.

He suggested that there were several publishers that would be interested and better fits for the subject matter, but added that, if none of them would take it, he would be interested in publishing it.

So, here I am. School ends May 20th. The next mandatory school event is the last full week of July. So I theoretically have two months in there to put together a draft. I’ve been rereading some of the source materials, and my blog posts on them, to get the information back fresh in mind.

Boundaries of the German Confederation with Prussia in blue, Austria in yellow, and the rest in grey. Via Wikipedia

I’d really like to stick to the original plan: write 2 books, one a short and popular history, footnoted and referenced and all that, but written to appeal to a non-academic reader. Then, the magnum opus, as long as it needs to be, with all the references and footnotes and rabbit holes spelled out. e.g., Dwight’s tour of Europe, at best a footnote in the popular history, would be spelled out in the context of Fichte’s reforms of the education system. (Dwight notes that speech in German social circles was very circumspect – there were plenty of topics it was not safe to discuss in public. Hmmm – the people implementing a system of schooling designed to destroy free will in the pupils and turn them into loyal patriotic Germans obedient without question to their superiors doesn’t favor free speech? Imagine my surprise.) Also, the details of Fichte’s insane philosophy and how it is expanded on by Hegel, the whole messianic schooling movement as a part of the intolerant Puritan obsession with control, the fundamental insanity of the Great Awakenings, how these movements formed Catholic converts Hecker and Brownson into wildly optimistic Pre-Millennialists; how this optimism persisted through the 1950s (at least) in the Church in America, leading to incredible blunders in the Church’s relationship to politics in general and the NEA in particular – these things will be touched upon in the popular book, but deserve a full treatment somewhere – thus, the second book. If I live long enough.

I got my work cut out for me. May God grant me the health, energy, and focus needed to get this project done!

Damaged Goods, revisited

(Most often, I will throw down some flash fiction, making it up as I go along, then reread it once for glaring errors, and hit publish. Generally, that’s all most of my ideas warrant. But, once in a while, I’ll reread a story, and get an uncomfortable feeling that there’s a much better story trying to get out, and I just fumbled it. I’m probably wrong, but this once, I’m going to try again…)

He wished he could fly. The small waves licked the tide pools. He sprawled on a sea-carved rock, his crooked feet next to several anemones in a filling puddle.

He wished he could walk. He could barely move. Some memory, half-grasped and slippery, suggested he once could run like the wind and fly like no bird. He thought he remembered stars effortlessly approached, then vanishing in the distance. He would look at some twinkling light, then simply be there. Then, be gone.

Whatever that was, he wished he could do it.


“What is it?” John stared at the screen. The viewsys showed – nothing, really. At the edges of vision, disappearing as soon as attention was paid to it, was – something. Maybe.

A metallic groan filled the ship.

“I get no readings.” William, John’s son, stood at the comm. The ship shook with a jerk. No lights flashed, no claxons blared.

“I am filled with dread,” Mary flatly stated. “This is wrong.” She stood motionless, then pulled a rosary from her pocket.

“Sweetheart, let’s stay calm,” John addressed his wife, and forced a smile. “If it weren’t for the unknown, there wouldn’t be much of anything out here.”

“There are stories,” mumbled William.


The waves now lapped his feet. The water was cold. The sun reddened the thin clouds on the horizon as it sped to touch the sea. He tried to draw himself up, away from the water’s edge, but his twisted, broken form would not comply.

What had happened? He could not remember clearly. Jagged shards of memory refused to be reassembled into anything clear. He realized that his mind mirrored the state of his body. Nothing worked. But he could not shake the vague idea that it should, that his mind and body once worked very well.

Something like a battle, in the same way that a bird’s flight was something like how he used to move among the stars. He was defending something….


William leapt to his feet. Reality shifted. The entire frame of reference leaned and stretched. The ship groaned, yet no alarms registered on the instruments. Mary staggered into her husbands arms as he fell to his knees.

William stumbled toward the view screen. “…care for my soul and body…” he whispered. He stood leaning at an impossible angle between the screen and his parents, and clutched the small crucifix that hung around his neck. “Hey, you!” he yelled at the Nothing on the screen, “Take this!”


A shaft of light from the setting sun broke through the red clouds and fell upon him. He found he could move a little and inched up the rocks. He could think a little better.

The light was warming against all expectation. With a start, some pieces fell into place. He had been defending a star – no, something small and fragile near the star. Something immeasurably huge and evil was trying to swallow it up, crush it, consume it. He simply could not let it.

He had thrown himself around the ship – for it was a ship – and the 3 passengers inside. He knew he could not defeat the evil, but he held on nonetheless.

Inside, a man and a woman held their dead son, a young man, a hero. He found himself swaddling the minds and souls of the passengers, protecting them, calming their fear. The immense evil had snuffed out the young man when he had dared stand up to it. Now, his soul was being drawn out, pulled, rent – by an invitation to despair.

He joined the parents in fighting back. He mingled with them, warmed them, comforted them in mind and body. He wasn’t sure how he did it, but it seemed both natural and demanded. He could not let them be destroyed, not so long as he had any strength.

The price was horrible. A cold dankness enveloped him, full of hate and fury.

He took it, blow after blow. He had the strange sensation that he was taking on the suffering of these human bodies, that the physical beating was not something he should feel.

The ship crumpled about him. The human passengers were being crushed. He knew this violence was unimaginably beyond what the humans could have withstood for a second. He knew it was his duty to defend them.

Wrapped in his protection, their souls clung to hope. He was mixed with them, shielding them, taking a beating for them, until the ship and those within it were crushed. The ship’s drive blew the three humans to dust. He persisted. The evil swelled, its hatred burned, all its force turned on him.

Somehow, in his pain, he knew that he had won. The souls of the human passengers were free. He lost consciousness, knowing he had won – the three human souls were free! The evil raged, and flung what was left of him down…


A brilliant light shone on the shore just as the sunlight faded over the ocean. He opened his eyes. “Well done!”

No words were spoken. Ideas formed directly in his head. “A Guardian standing up to a Principality?” He felt his body dissolving. “You willingly took on suffering intended for others.”

“I could not let them suffer the Second Death!”

“So you took their place.”

“I took on their form, so that I could take on their pain.”

“And saved them. The Master is pleased. His mother will comfort you. For they, too, willingly accepted the suffering of others. Be made whole.”

All was light. His body gone, he rose, and flew.

_____

Damaged Goods

He wished he could fly. The small waves licked the tide pools. He sat on a sea-carved rock, his crooked feet next to several anemones in a filling puddle.

He wished he could walk. He could barely move. Some memory, half-grasped and slippery, suggested he once could run like the wind and fly like no bird. He thought he remembered stars effortlessly approached, then vanishing in the distance. He would look at some twinkling light, then simply be there. Then, be gone.

Whatever that was, he wished he could do it.

The waves now lapped his feet. The water was cold. The sun reddened the thin clouds on the horizon as it sped to touch the sea. He tried to draw himself up, away from the water’s edge, but his twisted, broken form would not comply.

What had happened? He could not remember clearly. Shards of memory, jagged and fragmented, refused to be reassembled into anything clear. He realized that his mind mirrored the state of his body. Nothing worked. But he could not shake the vague idea that it should, that his mind and body once worked very well.

Something like a battle, in the same way that a bird’s flight was something like how he used to move among the stars. He was defending something….

A shaft of light from the setting sun broke through the red clouds and fell upon him. He found he could move a little and inched up the rocks. He could think a little better.

The light was warming against all expectation. With a start, some pieces fell into place. He had been defending a star – no, something small and fragile near the star. Something immeasurably huge and evil was trying to swallow it up, crush it, consume it. He simply could not let it.

He had thrown himself around the ship – for it was a ship – and the 3 passengers inside. He knew he could not defeat the evil, but he held on nonetheless.

Inside, a man and a woman held their dead son, a young man, a hero. He found himself swaddling the minds and souls of the passengers, protecting them, calming their fear. The immense evil had snuffed out the young man, not physically but spiritually, when he had dared stand up to it. Now, his soul was being drawn out, pulled, rent – by an invitation to despair.

He joined the parents in fighting back. He mingled with them, warmed them, comforted them in mind and body. He wasn’t sure how he did it, but it seemed both natural and demanded. He could not let them be destroyed, not so long as he had any strength.

The price was horrible. A cold dankness enveloped him, full of hate and fury.

He took it, blow after blow. He had the strange sensation that he was taking on the suffering of these human bodies, that the physical beating was not something he should feel.

The ship crumpled about him. The human passengers were being crushed. He knew this violence was unimaginably beyond what the humans could have withstood for a second. He knew it was his duty to defend them.

Wrapped in his protection, their souls clung to hope. He was mixed with them, shielding them, taking a beating for them, until the ship and those within it were crushed to dust. The evil swelled, its hatred burned, all its force turned on him!

Somehow, in his pain, he knew that he wad won. The souls of the human passengers were free. He lost consciousness, knowing he had won – the three human souls were free! The evil raged, and flung what was left of him down…

A brilliant light shone on the shore just as the sunlight faded over the ocean. He opened his eyes. “Well done!”

No works were spoken. Ideas formed directly in his head. “A Guardian standing up to a Principality?” He felt his body dissolving. “You willingly took on suffering intended for others.”

“I could not let them suffer the Second Death!”

“So you took their place.”

“I took on their form, so that I could take on their pain.”

“And saved them. The Master is pleased. His mother will comfort you. For they, too, willingly accepted the suffering of others. Be made whole.”

All was light. His body gone, he rose, and flew.

_____

(Getting all funky and experimental in my dotage…)

Dr. Boli Opines…

https://drboli.com/2023/03/23/what-you-can-do-with-ink/#more-17661

Here he sings the praises of ink, in the course of which he reminds us of the clear history of US constitutional law and points out that computers are not the answer:

“Let us ignore the facts of history for a moment. Let us simply forget that constitutional law in the United States is largely a record of successful abridgments of the Bill of Rights. Let us forget how many men and women went to prison for saying war was wrong in 1917.”

“The days are long past when a computer was a tool, like a pen or a hammer, that is manipulated by its purchaser. Now your computer is a branch office of the company that made the operating system. It is always in communication with general headquarters, and it is always doing things behind your back to make your life better, often with the result that functions you relied on have vanished. So there is no reason in principle why your computer could not simply lock your keyboard if it thought you were writing things you shouldn’t write. And if it can happen, simple prudence, informed by long experience, teaches us to assume that it will happen.”

Dr. Boli is an oasis of wit, clear thinking, and sanity. He is required daily reading.

19th Century Optimism

Whenever I read most anything from the 19th century, or about the 19th century written before WWI, I’m dazzled by the frankly insane levels of optimism. People, at least the people doing the bulk of the writing in English, seemed to truly believe, to the point of taking it for granted, that people were simply going to create an earthly paradise soon and very soon.

And it hardly matters what their religious beliefs were. Protestants, Catholics, atheists all seem to agree that Utopia was right around the corner. From my education reading, Hecker and Brownson, two prominent Catholics, though America would lead the way. While perhaps not exactly heretics of the Americanism flavor, they both had at least one toe on the line. Both, in different ways, subtly and not so subtly dismissed the two millennia of the Church’s experiences with the intransigence of human nature. Nope, America was different, and if we’d just make more room for the Spirit (Hecker) or trust in God’s revelation of His plan in America (Brownson, at least some of the time), everything would soon be right as rain!

19th century Marxists, who thought of themselves as atheists but really worshipped a jealous god too mystical and gnostic for any Christian, believed that the Workers Paradise was happening any day now. Prior to the Russian Revolution, it was possible to pretend it would arrive without too much violence and bloodshed – and so they so pretended.

And the Puritan and their Unitarian children – Chesterton, for one such child – seemed to hold to two mutually contradictory ideas both pointed toward Utopia: On the one hand, the Unitarian emotional world seemed strongly inclined to a niceness solution. Everybody play nice, and things will be fine. On the other, the Puritan conviction was that everything will be fine, as long as we’re in charge. If things aren’t fine, it’s because we’re not in charge. (These two notions have long been merged into the dominant post-modern idea: playing nice means doing exactly as we, your betters, tell you. But that’s another essay.)

Only rarely does one run across a Msgr. Benson, who warns of the spiritual downside of such a manmade Paradise. He wrote in 1906, when it was still possible to believe that Socialism would solve all the merely human problems.

Instead of Paradise, we got both 1984 and a Brave New World. For now, and only after the Utopian optimists had gotten millions killed in wars and purges.

Chesterton himself came around to view optimism of this sort as insane and evil. The evils of modern, circa 1930, optimists and pessimists was something he seemed never to tire of exposing..

As a post-modern writer – or whatever it is I am – the optimism of the 19th century seems plain insane.

03 19 2023 Music at Mass Review

Been a while since I’ve written one of these.

Attended mass in one of the number of little town that grew up in the gold fields of California along State Highway 49 back in the mid 1800s. Some of these towns have lovely churches build a hundred years or more ago, but most have structures thrown up in the last 60 years or so.

The builders of this church evidently salvages some stained glass from a much earlier church – the tabernacle was flanked by some beautiful windows, including a lovely Madonna and their patron saint. The sanctuary itself was nice, simple but lovely woodwork everywhere. The body of the church was the by now traditional linoleum floored barn with unnecessarily ugly walls, ceilings, and fixtures.

An annoying and never ending susurrus greets one upon entering. Look like a barn, expect to sound like a barn, it seems. The ‘band’ was stationed to the left of the sanctuary – one guy might have been in his 50s, the other three, one woman and two men, had plenty of gray hair.

To be fair, while younger people were fairly represented, the congregation skewed older. (Two lovely young women in the pew behind us wore chapel veils, but that was certainly not the general vibe. )

I had just been discussing with (more like monologuing at) my long-suffering wife about how great music, upon a first hearing, at first sounds subtly surprising, but quickly becomes inevitable. Beethoven, to take the poster boy, will hit you with brisk, often startling, material and quick modulations – that, once played and heard, become impossible to imagine otherwise. Think the 2nd movement of the 7th Symphony – that is a surprising piece of music, but after a single listen, it’s hard to imagine changing a single note – it is that profoundly right.

Church music does rise to that level. Think ‘O Sacred Head Surrounded’ or the Jupiter hymn tune by Holst – any notes out of place? Any chance you’re forgetting those tunes? Not for me, at least. Some chant and polyphony are also that way.

Alas, we heard none of that today. Our aging quartet of folk guitarists and singers went to the usual shallow well people their age and skill level always draw from: St. Louis Jebbies, Toolan, and OCP stars. Nothing unexpected in that, but I guess my hope springs eternal.

Two of the pieces were familiar from decades of repetition: while hardly memorable on their merits, they perhaps rise to the level of least bad of their kind. Two pieces were especially unmemorable: the responsorial Psalm 23, and the completely forgettable closing hymn.

How many real composers have set Psalm 23 – “The Lord is my Shepherd”? Yet this band managed to find a setting so bland and forgettable that I had a little difficulty remembering the repetitious refrain between verses. Neither surprising nor inevitable.

The closing song was another completely forgettable ditty call (I asked my wife if she remembered, because I certainly didn’t) “Take up your cross”. Directionless, repetitive, random. Used a variation on the same set of four chords every praise and worship song has used for several decades now.

So, alas! Our Laetare Sunday was not brightened by beautiful music. On the plus side, we have several musicians working to add a little quality to local parishes. My son and I joined the local parish choir, because the director is trying, and having a couple of men who can carry parts has got to help. But I was out of town today.

Perhaps liturgical music, like science, advances one funeral at a time.

What’s Going on Here? Coof Madness Update

America’ COVID Response Was Based on Lies” This is a Newsweek article, published today. In other words, a tactical ‘information’ release by some faction of our government. I’m not a student of the internal power struggles that characterize emerging oligarchies, so I have few thoughts on why, after three long years, an organ of the oligarchs is saying what every scientifically literate and non-terrified person was saying since April of 2020. Somebody perhaps wants to see certain people swinging from lamp posts, or at least fire a shot across the bow to keep opposing factions in line. Or maybe something else – but nothing gets published these days without getting run by some faction or other of the Ministry of Truth.

Here’s the list of lies from the article, along with some light commentary in italics. I could link back to articles here on this blog showing where I said pretty much the same damn things, but I’m beyond sick of this crap.

1. SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has a far higher fatality rate than the flu by several orders of magnitude. The coof is bad cold level dangerous. People forget the common saying: “Catch your death of cold”. Old people – and the median age at death “from” Covid is around 80 – very commonly die from pneumonia, where a cold or flu settles into their lungs for keeps. The coof is no different, and no more dangerous.

2. Everyone is at significant risk to die from this virus. If you’re under 50 and reasonably healthy, you might as well worry about getting struck by lightening as dying of the coof. If you are reasonably healthy at ANY age, coof adds very little to your overal risk profile.

3. No one has any immunological protection, because this virus is completely new. The very concept of a “completely new” virus reveals complete ignorance of basic biology and logic.

4. Asymptomatic people are major drivers of the spread. Here is a classic reversal: rather than the people making a claim providing the evidence that their claim is true, they assume they are correct, and attempt to make people challenging the unsubstantiated claim provide the proof. No. The way it works: you want me to do or believe something? You convince ME. I don’t have to prove to you that asymptomatic people spread a disease – YOU need to prove to me that they do. But such transmission was conclusively presumed, and anyone who pointed out the utter lack of evidence that it was true was vilified.

5. Locking down—closing schools and businesses, confining people to their homes, stopping non-COVID medical care, and eliminating travel—will stop or eliminate the virus. Now we’re playing the game of pretending these brutal, totalitarian measures ‘worked’ in some vague sense, but certainly not the sense in which, you know, they slowed or stopped the spread of the virus.

6. Masks will protect everyone and stop the spread. Ignoring 100 years of studies and the experiences worldwide during the Spanish Flu, our betters produce the famous 70 studies within weeks all purporting to prove that masks slow the spread of the Coof, and vilifying anyone who dares disagree. Riiiiight.

7. The virus is known to be naturally occurring, and claiming it originated in a lab is a conspiracy theory. “Known to be” – how? How does one even go about proving such a thing?

8. Teachers are at especially high risk. Right. 80 year old teachers with cardiovascular failing in nursing homes, maybe.

9. COVID vaccines stop the spread of the infection. Too stupid to even address.

10. Immune protection only comes from a vaccine. Huh? Again, relying on the public’s complete ignorance of how immunity works.

And I’d add a Lie #11. More than 1 million American died from Covid. As Dr. Atlas more properly puts it: More than 1 million American deaths have been attributed to that virus. The processes by which they were so attributed guarantee that that number wildly overstates the true number of deaths *from* Covid versus deaths *with* Covid. Our CDC staunchly refused to collect and publish the data that would enable a reasonable person to determine how much the official death numbers overstate Covid deaths, but studies from other nations show something under 10% of attributed deaths were caused *by* Covid, as opposed to a person dying anyway but being diagnosed with Covid – such as the 50-60% of the Covid deaths that happened in nursing homes, where Americans go to die.

Odds. Ends.

Castles in the Clouds, weather division: In today’s weather forecast, the computer-generated model shows a giant storm off Japan – shaped like Japan:

Why, yes, I am easily amused.

Recently read Cecil Chesterton’s short biography of his big brother Gilbert Keith. It’s good – Cecil published it anonymously, but he didn’t fool anyone. Both brothers – here, Cecil, and in G. K.’s autobiography – admit they spent their childhood arguing, interrupted only by silly little things like sleep and meals. Man, to be a fly n the wall for those arguments. It is to be noted that they both understood ‘argument’ to be, in the words of Monte Python, a structured series of statements meant to establish a proposition. They both frown mightily on mere disputation and gainsaying.

Cecil died right at the end of WWI, after thrice being sent home wounded, and thrice returning to battle. Thus, G.K. was 45 and Cecil 40 when Cecil died. The love between the Chesterton Brothers is palpable.

Cecil says what one must suspect, just looking at the shelf space the complete works of G. K. Chesterton would occupy: G. K. wrote almost constantly. Yet he never seemed hurried, and would more than gladly while away an afternoon drinking with his buddies or talking with whoever he happened to bump into. He was what previous ages referred to as a man of energy – nuclear-level, in G.K.’s case.

Finally, can’t remember the exact quote or even the author, but here’s something to consider in these days of decline and ruin (and growth and opportunity): Try to change yourself. Then you will understand how hard it is to change anyone else.

From G. K. Chesterton’s Autobiography

Been reading the above. (Just finished his biography by his brother Cecil – wild. ) In chapter 8 G. K. describes some of the characters he worked with on Fleet Street. Below is a bit about the scion of a noble Scottish family:

A man of that impossible sort, of finer spiritual culture and, therefore, of less fame or success, was Johnston Stephen, who was, I am proud to say, my friend…. He once made to me the very sensible remark, “The only little difficulty that I have about joining the Catholic Church is that I do not think I believe in God. All the rest of the Catholic system is so obviously right and so obviously superior to anything else, that I cannot imagine anyone having any doubt about it.” And I remember that he was grimly gratified when I told him, at a later stage of my own beliefs, that real Catholics are intelligent enough to have this difficulty; and that St. Thomas Aquinas practically begins his whole argument by saying, “Is there a God? Apparently not.” But, I added, it was my experience that entering into the system even socially brought an ever-increasing certitude upon the original question. For the rest, while a fierily patriotic Scotsman, he had too much of such sympathy to be popular with many Scots. I remember when he was asked whether the Church was not corrupt and crying out for the Reformation, he answered with disconcerting warmth, “Who can doubt it? How horrible must have been the corruption which could have tolerated for so long three Catholic priests like John Knox and John Calvin and Martin Luther.”

Marketing Wisdom

I spent maybe 20 years as a Marketing Director – said so on my business card, so it must be true! And while it was a minor part of my job, for reasons related to the particular niche we marketed to, I did learn some truths that are not simply Machiavelli for weak people:

You are responsible for how people understand you. We had a marketing director prior to my taking on the job who used say stuff like: I explained it. If they refuse to understand, that’s their problem, not mine.

Nope, nope, a thousand times nope. If you get into marketing, you MUST own the understanding people in your target market have of your company. If there’s a disconnect, that most certainly IS your problem!

Another profession for which this is true is teacher. You can cover the white board with notes, drone on in lectures, hand out assignments, give tests – and it is very much YOUR problem if the kiddos don’t understand.

Next, we get to something a little more potentially Eeeeevil: people are going to process what you say and what you show them with their reptilian brain FIRST, THEN, MAYBE, you can reason with them. In more common language, first impressions matter. Your unconscious reactions are emotional and, at best, pre-logical. At worst, you find yourself liking or hating something without any real or even potential thought having taken place.

And here’s the key most people miss: this has nothing to do with intelligence! Even the most rational people are still seeing you or your marketing materials and forming ideas about them before their intellects kick in. The eeeeevil part: good, in the sense of effective, mass marketing recognizes the need to appeal to the reptilian brain, and strives to simply avoid any involvement of the intellect whatsoever. You show pictures of attractive, happy people using your products – and try to stop right there. Because, really, Fords and not materially better than Chevies (or visa-versa, your pick); Coke is not materially better than Pepsi; the Yankees are not more despicable than the Red Sox (they’re both equally loathsome – oops! that was my inner lizard speaking!). And so on, ad infinitum.

Politics are absolutely in this camp: the efforts to get you to trust/not trust one or the other political party is relentless, generational – and utterly mindless. The ability to tolerate cognitive dissonance to the point where it is literally unimaginable has been cultivated in us marks for a couple centuries now. (Archbishop Dolan, having finally awakened to the possibility Democrats were merely using Catholics and having a very hard time with this realization, says his Grandmother used to whisper: “We Catholics don’t trust those Republicans.” By his grandmother’s time, this had already been going on for generations.)

On a less evil basis, a marketing person has to work hard to make sure he doesn’t trigger any unconscious negative reactions in his target market, so that they can have a rational discussion. This truth is also widely applicable, from dating to apologetics.

Finally, of the transcendentals – the good, the true, and the beautiful – marketing is concerned first and primarily with the beautiful. The reptilian brain can, sometimes, sense the beautiful, or, rather, does not react negatively to the beautiful. Beauty both sooths, in a sense, our inner lizard, and quickly engages the intellect and the heart. Weirdly enough, when selling our highly niche analytic software, sometime an effective technique was to simply show a prospect a list of accounting reports – yes, accountants find nice tidy reports beautiful, and their inner lizards move quickly from there to the ‘one of us’ reaction. Since I can show them accounting reports and talk their language about them, I’m instantly one of the boys. You’d think they’d want to know if those reports are ‘right’, but that comes later, and the battle is all but won if we get to that point.

In summary, if you are trying to teach or convince anyone, you are responsible for how they understand you. First impressions matter. Lead with the beautiful.

And that’s all for today.