A Comment or Two on the Current Unpleasantness

In the Church.

In general, I follow the rule of not getting emotionally or intellectually involved in the dirt, and not saying anything bad about priests. I recommend it for us peanut gallery folks.

Today, however, want to point out something subtle and pernicious and so very modern in the way many church leaders seem to think think.

Take this, for today’s example:

https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/cardinal-cupich-pope-bigger-agenda_Chicago-491855581.html

cupich

Here we have Cardinal Cupich explaining that:

  1. the Pope has a bigger agenda than dealing with the sex abuse scandal
  2. It’s a rabbit hole – dealing with it would derail more important things
  3. The pope has a record of acting when actionable information is made known
  4. People don’t like the pope because he’s Latino
  5. It’s not just about the Catholic Church.

So:

  1. It is not the primary duty of the Church, the Bride of Christ, to be holy. The personal holiness of all Catholics and most especially of Her priests, ordered to their salvation, can be set aside for the sake of the environment and migrants, for example.
  2. Seeking justice and truth is a far too involved and time-consuming activity when other more pressing goals are on the table.
  3. The pope acting on credible information – isn’t that the question being asked? It is a rabbit hole to ask it? Seems a fairly straight forward question. Either Vigano’s information wasn’t actionable or was never known by the pope. Well? Is this the denial Francis himself would not make?
  4. This is simply too absurd for serious consideration. Really? People were all cool with Italian (or Polish or German) popes, but an Argentinian pope (of Italian ancestry!) is just too much? This reeks of deflection and desperation.
  5. The church somehow can only act if EVERYBODY gets on the sex abuse bandwagon? We now *follow* in moral issues, instead of lead? Or does the Church get a pass because gym teachers also abuse people?

The basic attitude here is political. Some powerful subset of the bishops has long seen their role as primarily political, of trying to get the state under the guidance of Democratic party to do the good works of the Church. Worries about the spiritual well-being of their flocks and priests are easily classified as rabbit holes, things that merely distract from their *real* job of using political influence to create heaven on earth.

It’s no surprise that this is being said by Chicago’s archbishop – a city long given to big Catholic funerals and weddings for criminals, mobsters and murderers who, nonetheless, were the political powers and so could not be offended. Habitually letting the personal criminal behaviors of the people you are courting for political reasons slide for Higher Goals in the Big Picture, ignoring their advocacy for sins like abortion and sodomy because they never met a union or refugee they didn’t love, is a habit of contempt for Christian charity. Let them die the second death, so long as we get to unionize and outlaw capital punishment!

They all seem to think they’re Cardinal Richelieu (as if that would be desirable). They’ll let others loose their souls, and loose their own, if they go to bed at night having been patted on the head by the right kind of politicians.

All those saints, starting with John the Baptist, who called out the sins of the powerful and got persecuted, banished and murdered – pray for us! Pray for our priests, bishops and pope! And pray we have the strength to do the same.

Author: Joseph Moore

Enough with the smarty-pants Dante quote. Just some opinionated blogger dude.

2 thoughts on “A Comment or Two on the Current Unpleasantness”

  1. Pope Malcolm the Cynic would:

    – End internal abuse investigations immediately and outsource everything to proper authorities. That should never have been a thing in the first place.

    – Give a tearful and heartfelt apology acknowledging that we completely failed and betrayed the faithful, begging for forgiveness, and promising to do better in the future complete with a list of concrete, measurable, transparent ways we intend to do so

    – Run comparable grand jury reports in every U.S. state, and generally as many areas of the world as possible.

    – All Cardinals, Bishops, and Priests who knew anything at all and tried to cover it up or even did nothing are to be laicized immediately with no recourse to rejoin the Priesthood

    – Controversial point number one: Allow married Priests. The infestation of predatory homosexuals has been disastrous. Priesthood no longer holds the respected position of honor that would attract the vast majority of men willing to make that sacrifice, and families are no longer having 9 children so one can be “spared” for the Priesthood. Bite the bullet. Let in married Priests.

    – Controversial point 2: Be more selective in seminaries. If a man is effeminate, calmly and explain with compassion that being a Parish Priest does not suit their temperament. Suggest a monastery if they truly feel called. But one way or another the Priesthood must become the domain of men again.

  2. Malcolm,

    Very interesting proposals. With respect to married priest would you apply the Easter rite rule:married priests are the parish priest but the Bishops and monks are celibate?
    How would you permanently obliterate the lavender mafia?
    As for outsourcing agreed but in other countries like in Europe there’s a strong anticlericalism that needs to have an eye kept on
    But overall I agree with 5he general points

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s